Explore
Der Abschreckungseffekt auf die Grundrechtsausübung
Julian Staben
2016-2017
0 Ungluers have
Faved this Work
Login to Fave
Julian Staben examines chilling effects, framed as deterrence-based lines of argument, in the jurisprudence of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (German Federal Constitutional Court) and compares them with the jurisprudence of the US Supreme Court. Chilling effects follow distinct patterns when it comes to online behaviour and emerging digital practices and therefore call for their constitutional reassessment. Julian Staben's work enables a more methodologically reflective use of these arguments in the judicial discourse.
This book is included in DOAB.
Why read this book? Have your say.
You must be logged in to comment.
Rights Information
Are you the author or publisher of this work? If so, you can claim it as yours by registering as an Unglue.it rights holder.Downloads
This work has been downloaded 551 times via unglue.it ebook links.
- 98 - pdf (CC BY-NC-ND) at OAPEN Library.
- 151 - pdf (CC BY-NC-ND) at Unglue.it.
Keywords
- Abschreckung
- Bundesverfassungsgericht
- chilling effects
- Comparative law
- Constitutional & administrative law
- Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts
- German Federal Constitutional Court
- Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- Grundrechte
- Grundrechte (Deutschland)
- Jurisprudence
- KUnlatched
- LAB
- LAM
- Law
- Law / Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice
- Law Review
- LAW016000
- LAW017000
- LAW018000
- LAW051000
- LAW052000
- LAW075000
- LAW089000
- LBG
- LND
- Oberster Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten
- Philosophy of law
- Political Science
- Rechtsprechung
- Theory of Law
- US Supreme Court
Links
DOI: 10.1628/9783161554889Editions