Explore
Contrary to the common constriction of the euthanasia-discussion on “self-determination at the end of life" Eva Schumann claims rethinking in dealing with seriously ill and dying people. To meet their needs in her view a comprehensive access to outpatient and inpatient palliative care facilities is recquired and also improvements of care in nursing homes as well as offers to improve the integration of members into care. These claims conclude the discussion between assistance in dying (indirect euthanasia), and assistance to die (active and passive euthanasia). Taking account historical, interdisciplinary and comparative law issues it is demonstrated that the formal legal distinction between the various case groups of euthanasia not sufficiently takes into account the social dimension of dying.
This book is included in DOAB.
Why read this book? Have your say.
You must be logged in to comment.
Rights Information
Are you the author or publisher of this work? If so, you can claim it as yours by registering as an Unglue.it rights holder.Downloads
This work has been downloaded 51 times via unglue.it ebook links.
- 51 - pdf (CC BY-ND) at OAPEN Library.
Keywords
- Criminal law & procedure
- Ethical issues & debates
- Ethical issues: euthanasia & right to die
- Euthanasia
- geriatric welfare
- Law
- Laws of Specific jurisdictions
- Society & culture: general
- Society & Social Sciences
Links
DOI: 10.17875/gup2006-21Editions