Explore
The Pandemic of Argumentation
0 Ungluers have
Faved this Work
Login to Fave
This open access book addresses communicative aspects of the current COVID-19 pandemic as well as the epidemic of misinformation from the perspective of argumentation theory. Argumentation theory is uniquely placed to understand and account for the challenges of public reason as expressed through argumentative discourse. The book thus focuses on the extent to which the forms, norms and functions of public argumentation have changed in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. This question is investigated along the three main research lines of the COST Action project CA 17132: European network for Argumentation and Public PoLicY analysis (APPLY): descriptive, normative, and prescriptive. The volume offers a broad range of contributions which treat argumentative phenomena that are directly related to the changes in public discourse in the wake of the outburst of COVID-19. The volume additionally places particular emphasis on expert argumentation, given (i) the importance expert discourse has had over the last two years, and (ii) the challenges that expert argumentation has faced in the public sphere as a result of scientific uncertainty and widespread misinformation. Contributions are divided into three groups, which (i) examine various features and aspects of public and institutional discourse about the COVID-19 pandemic, (ii) scrutinize the way health policies have been discussed, debated, attacked and defended in the public sphere, and (iii) consider a range of proposals meant to improve the quality of public discourse, and public deliberation in particular, in such a way that concrete proposals for argumentative literacy will be brought to light. Overall, this volume constitutes a timely inquiry into all things argumentative in pandemic discourse. This volume is of interest to a broad readership including philosophers, linguists, communication and legal scholars, and members of the wider public who seek to better understand the discourse surrounding communicative phenomena in times of crisis. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) is a funding organisation for research and innovation networks. For more information: www.cost.eu
This book is included in DOAB.
Why read this book? Have your say.
You must be logged in to comment.
Rights Information
Are you the author or publisher of this work? If so, you can claim it as yours by registering as an Unglue.it rights holder.Downloads
This work has been downloaded 23 times via unglue.it ebook links.
- 23 - pdf (CC BY) at OAPEN Library.
Keywords
- Analysing the Public Debate About Lockdown
- Argument Propagation
- Argumentation Covid
- Argumentative Dark Side of Pandemic Discourse
- Argumentative Literacy
- Conspiracy Theory Covid
- Controversies and Dispute in France During the Covid-19 Crisis
- Evaluative Component in Pragmatic Argumentation
- Expanded Understanding of the Role of Analogy
- Fake News Propagation
- Language
- Linguistics
- Media Studies
- Metalinguistic Arguments on What Counts As “Covid-19 Death”
- Misinformation Pandemic
- open access
- philosophy of language
- Political Interference and Argumentative Styles
- public debate
- public Discourse First Wave Sars-Cov-2 Pandemic in Italy
- Public Health Discourse
- Responding to the COVID Conspiracy Theories
- Society & culture: general
- Society & Social Sciences
- thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics
- thema EDItEUR::C Language and Linguistics::CF Linguistics::CFA Philosophy of language
- thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences
- thema EDItEUR::J Society and Social Sciences::JB Society and culture: general::JBC Cultural and media studies::JBCT Media studies
- Trust/Mistrust in Science
- Why Narratives are More Powerful Arguments than Fact-Checking
Links
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4Editions