Feedback

X
Legalità e mutamenti giurisprudenziali nel diritto penale

Legalità e mutamenti giurisprudenziali nel diritto penale

it

0 Ungluers have Faved this Work
Over the past several years, constitutional, supreme and human rights courts had to deal with the problem of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law with ever-greater intensity. Following the case Contrada c. Italie, in which the European Court of Human Rights found a violation of the legality principle under Art. 7 due to an unforeseeable retrospective application of a judicially created criminal offence, the issue of citizens’ safeguard upon an overruling occurrence is even more in the foreground. What temporal effect is best given to an unfavorable overruling decision? Should its application be limited to acts and conduct occurring after it or should it operate retrospectively and subject to criminal responsibility those who, acting in reliance on an earlier decision, did only what courts declared to be lawful? A limited prohibition of adjudicative retroactivity in criminal law seems to help foster an up-to-date relationship between the individual and the state.

This book is included in DOAB.

Why read this book? Have your say.

You must be logged in to comment.

Rights Information

Are you the author or publisher of this work? If so, you can claim it as yours by registering as an Unglue.it rights holder.

Downloads

This work has been downloaded 33 times via unglue.it ebook links.
  1. 33 - pdf (CC BY) at OAPEN Library.

Keywords

  • adjudicative retroactivity
  • criminal law
  • Criminal law & procedure
  • foreseeability
  • Law
  • Laws of Specific jurisdictions
  • legality principle
  • mistake of law
  • prospective overruling

Links

DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-368-0

Editions

edition cover

Share

Copy/paste this into your site: