Explore
All judges legitimize their decisions in writing, but US Supreme Court justices depend on public acceptance to a unique degree. Previous studies of judicial opinions have explored rhetorical strategies that produce legitimacy, but none have examined the laudatory, even operatic, forms of writing Supreme Court justices have used to justify fundamental rights decisions. Doug Coulson demonstrates that such “judicial rhapsodies” are not an aberration but a central feature of judicial discourse.
First examining the classical origins of divisions between law and rhetoric, Coulson tracks what he calls an epideictic register—highly affective forms of expression that utilize hyperbole, amplification, and vocabularies of praise—through a surprising number of landmark Supreme Court opinions. Judicial Rhapsodies recovers and revalues these instances as significant to establishing and maintaining shared perspectives that form the basis for common experience and cooperation.
This book is included in DOAB.
Why read this book? Have your say.
You must be logged in to comment.
Rights Information
Are you the author or publisher of this work? If so, you can claim it as yours by registering as an Unglue.it rights holder.Downloads
This work has been downloaded 60 times via unglue.it ebook links.
- 38 - epub (CC BY-NC-ND) at Unglue.it.
- 22 - pdf (CC BY-NC-ND) at Unglue.it.
Keywords
- Courts & procedure
- Judicial powers
- Jurisprudence & general issues
- Jurisprudence and general issues
- Language
- Law
- Laws of Specific jurisdictions
- Legal system: general
- Legal systems: judicial powers
- Linguistics
- Semantics, discourse analysis, etc
- Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics
Links
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.12752816Editions