Explore
When sentencing, courts must find an appropriate punishment in the area of conflict between individualization and equal treatment. In the dogmatic part, this dissertation shows that individualization is wrongly given priority in case law. The consequences became clear in the course of our own empirical study of almost 240 criminal court judges: there are considerable differences in sentencing between them. The fact that the freest possible discretion leads to appropriate sentences must therefore at least be called into question. The paper concludes by outlining measures to improve the uniformity of sentencing without making it impossible to assess individual cases.
This book is included in DOAB.
Why read this book? Have your say.
You must be logged in to comment.
Rights Information
Are you the author or publisher of this work? If so, you can claim it as yours by registering as an Unglue.it rights holder.Downloads
This work has been downloaded 3 times via unglue.it ebook links.
- 3 - pdf (CC BY) at OAPEN Library.
Keywords
- thema EDItEUR::L Law
Links
DOI: 10.38107/060Editions